Side-by-side comparison
GLM 5V Turbo vs o4 Mini High
Z.ai
GLM 5V Turbo
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.2000
Output / 1M
$4.0000
OpenAI
o4 Mini High
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.1000
Output / 1M
$4.4000
| GLM 5V Turbo | o4 Mini High | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 202,752 | 200,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 1.2000 | 1.1000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 4.0000 | 4.4000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or o4 Mini High?
GLM 5V Turbo is cheaper than o4 Mini High on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.15 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or o4 Mini High?
GLM 5V Turbo has the larger context window at 203k tokens versus 200k tokens for o4 Mini High. That means GLM 5V Turbo can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini High?
GLM 5V Turbo comes from Z.ai; o4 Mini High comes from OpenAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.