Side-by-side comparison
GLM 4.5 Air vs Kimi K2 0711
| GLM 4.5 Air | Kimi K2 0711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | MoonshotAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1300 | 0.5700 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.8500 | 2.3000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Kimi K2 0711?
GLM 4.5 Air is cheaper than Kimi K2 0711 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.945 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between GLM 4.5 Air and Kimi K2 0711?
GLM 4.5 Air comes from Z.ai; Kimi K2 0711 comes from MoonshotAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.