Side-by-side comparison
GLM 4 32B vs Hy3 preview
| GLM 4 32B | Hy3 preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | Tencent |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 128,000 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.0660 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.2600 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GLM 4 32B or Hy3 preview?
GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Hy3 preview on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.063 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, GLM 4 32B or Hy3 preview?
Hy3 preview has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 128k tokens for GLM 4 32B . That means Hy3 preview can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between GLM 4 32B and Hy3 preview?
GLM 4 32B comes from Z.ai; Hy3 preview comes from Tencent. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.