Side-by-side comparison
Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen
Qwen3.6 Plus
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.3250
Output / 1M
$1.9500
| Grok 4.3 | Qwen3.6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 1.2500 | 0.3250 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.5000 | 1.9500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper than Grok 4.3 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.7375 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.6 Plus?
Grok 4.3 comes from xAI; Qwen3.6 Plus comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.