Side-by-side comparison
Grok 4.20 vs MiMo-V2.5
| Grok 4.20 | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 2,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 1.2500 | 0.4000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.5000 | 2.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper than Grok 4.20 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.675 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.20 or MiMo-V2.5?
Grok 4.20 has the larger context window at 2M tokens versus 1M tokens for MiMo-V2.5. That means Grok 4.20 can ingest about 1.9x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Grok 4.20 and MiMo-V2.5?
Grok 4.20 comes from xAI; MiMo-V2.5 comes from Xiaomi. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.