Side-by-side comparison
UnslopNemo 12B vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
TheDrummer
UnslopNemo 12B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.4000
Output / 1M
$0.4000
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.4000
Output / 1M
$0.4000
| UnslopNemo 12B | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | TheDrummer | Meta |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 32,768 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.4000 | 0.4000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4000 | 0.4000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, UnslopNemo 12B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
UnslopNemo 12B is cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, UnslopNemo 12B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 33k tokens for UnslopNemo 12B. That means Llama 3.1 70B Instruct can ingest about 4.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between UnslopNemo 12B and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
UnslopNemo 12B comes from TheDrummer; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct comes from Meta. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.