Side-by-side comparison
Skyfall 36B V2 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
| Skyfall 36B V2 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | TheDrummer | Baidu Qianfan |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 32,768 | 123,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.5500 | 0.2800 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.8000 | 1.1000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Skyfall 36B V2 or ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ?
Skyfall 36B V2 is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.015 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Skyfall 36B V2 or ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has the larger context window at 123k tokens versus 33k tokens for Skyfall 36B V2. That means ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B can ingest about 3.8x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Skyfall 36B V2 and ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ?
Skyfall 36B V2 comes from TheDrummer; ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B comes from Baidu Qianfan. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.