Side-by-side comparison
Rocinante 12B vs Trinity Large Preview
TheDrummer
Rocinante 12B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1700
Output / 1M
$0.4300
Arcee AI
Trinity Large Preview
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1500
Output / 1M
$0.4500
| Rocinante 12B | Trinity Large Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | TheDrummer | Arcee AI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 32,768 | 131,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1700 | 0.1500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4300 | 0.4500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Rocinante 12B or Trinity Large Preview?
Rocinante 12B is cheaper than Trinity Large Preview on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Rocinante 12B or Trinity Large Preview?
Trinity Large Preview has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 33k tokens for Rocinante 12B. That means Trinity Large Preview can ingest about 4.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Rocinante 12B and Trinity Large Preview?
Rocinante 12B comes from TheDrummer; Trinity Large Preview comes from Arcee AI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.