Side-by-side comparison
Hy3 preview vs GLM 4 32B
| Hy3 preview | GLM 4 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Z.ai |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0660 | 0.1000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.2600 | 0.1000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Hy3 preview or GLM 4 32B ?
GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Hy3 preview on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.063 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Hy3 preview or GLM 4 32B ?
Hy3 preview has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 128k tokens for GLM 4 32B . That means Hy3 preview can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Hy3 preview and GLM 4 32B ?
Hy3 preview comes from Tencent; GLM 4 32B comes from Z.ai. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.