Side-by-side comparison
Hy3 preview vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
Baidu Qianfan
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.0700
Output / 1M
$0.2800
| Hy3 preview | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Baidu Qianfan |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 120,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0660 | 0.0700 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.2600 | 0.2800 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Hy3 preview or ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
Hy3 preview is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.012 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Hy3 preview or ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
Hy3 preview has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 120k tokens for ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B. That means Hy3 preview can ingest about 2.2x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Hy3 preview and ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
Hy3 preview comes from Tencent; ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B comes from Baidu Qianfan. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.