Side-by-side comparison
Step 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0900
Output / 1M
$0.3000
| Step 3.5 Flash | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.0900 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.3000 | 0.3000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Step 3.5 Flash or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than Step 3.5 Flash on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.005 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Step 3.5 Flash and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?
Step 3.5 Flash comes from StepFun; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.