Side-by-side comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 vs Inflection 3 Productivity
Sao10K
Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1
Input / 1M
$3.0000
Output / 1M
$3.0000
Inflection
Inflection 3 Productivity
Input / 1M
$2.5000
Output / 1M
$10.0000
| Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 | Inflection 3 Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Sao10K | Inflection |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 16,000 | 8,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 3.0000 | 2.5000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 3.0000 | 10.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 or Inflection 3 Productivity?
Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 is cheaper than Inflection 3 Productivity on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $3.25 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 or Inflection 3 Productivity?
Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 has the larger context window at 16k tokens versus 8k tokens for Inflection 3 Productivity. That means Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 and Inflection 3 Productivity?
Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 comes from Sao10K; Inflection 3 Productivity comes from Inflection. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.