Side-by-side comparison
Reka Flash 3 vs Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1
Mistral
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1
Input / 1M
$0.1100
Output / 1M
$0.1900
| Reka Flash 3 | Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Rekaai | Mistral |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 65,536 | 2,824 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.1100 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.2000 | 0.1900 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Reka Flash 3 or Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1?
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1 is cheaper than Reka Flash 3 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Reka Flash 3 or Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1?
Reka Flash 3 has the larger context window at 66k tokens versus 3k tokens for Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1. That means Reka Flash 3 can ingest about 23.2x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Reka Flash 3 and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1?
Reka Flash 3 comes from Rekaai; Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1 comes from Mistral. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.