Side-by-side comparison
Reka Flash 3 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
| Reka Flash 3 | Llama 3.2 3B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Rekaai | Meta |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 65,536 | 80,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.0510 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.2000 | 0.3400 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Reka Flash 3 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?
Reka Flash 3 is cheaper than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.0455 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Reka Flash 3 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has the larger context window at 80k tokens versus 66k tokens for Reka Flash 3. That means Llama 3.2 3B Instruct can ingest about 1.2x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Reka Flash 3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?
Reka Flash 3 comes from Rekaai; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct comes from Meta. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.