Side-by-side comparison
Reka Edge vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Mistral
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0750
Output / 1M
$0.2000
| Reka Edge | Mistral Small 3.2 24B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Rekaai | Mistral |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 16,384 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.0750 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.2000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Reka Edge or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?
Reka Edge is cheaper than Mistral Small 3.2 24B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.0375 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Reka Edge or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B has the larger context window at 128k tokens versus 16k tokens for Reka Edge. That means Mistral Small 3.2 24B can ingest about 7.8x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Reka Edge and Mistral Small 3.2 24B?
Reka Edge comes from Rekaai; Mistral Small 3.2 24B comes from Mistral. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.