Side-by-side comparison
Reka Edge vs Ministral 3 3B 2512
Mistral
Ministral 3 3B 2512
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1000
Output / 1M
$0.1000
| Reka Edge | Ministral 3 3B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Rekaai | Mistral |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 16,384 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.1000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.1000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Reka Edge or Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Reka Edge is cheaper than Ministral 3 3B 2512 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Reka Edge or Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Ministral 3 3B 2512 has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 16k tokens for Reka Edge. That means Ministral 3 3B 2512 can ingest about 8.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Reka Edge and Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Reka Edge comes from Rekaai; Ministral 3 3B 2512 comes from Mistral. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.