Side-by-side comparison
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Qwen
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1300
Output / 1M
$0.5200
xAI
Grok 4.1 Fast
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2000
Output / 1M
$0.5000
| Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | xAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 2,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1300 | 0.2000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.5200 | 0.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper than Grok 4.1 Fast on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.025 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast has the larger context window at 2M tokens versus 131k tokens for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct. That means Grok 4.1 Fast can ingest about 15.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Grok 4.1 Fast?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comes from Qwen; Grok 4.1 Fast comes from xAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.