Side-by-side comparison
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Grok 3 Mini Beta
Qwen
Qwen3 Coder Next
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1100
Output / 1M
$0.8000
| Qwen3 Coder Next | Grok 3 Mini Beta | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | xAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1100 | 0.3000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.8000 | 0.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Grok 3 Mini Beta?
Grok 3 Mini Beta is cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.055 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder Next or Grok 3 Mini Beta?
Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 131k tokens for Grok 3 Mini Beta. That means Qwen3 Coder Next can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen3 Coder Next and Grok 3 Mini Beta?
Qwen3 Coder Next comes from Qwen; Grok 3 Mini Beta comes from xAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.