Side-by-side comparison
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Qwen
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2600
Output / 1M
$1.5600
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2500
Output / 1M
$1.5000
| Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2600 | 0.2500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.5600 | 1.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is cheaper than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.035 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 1M tokens for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15. That means Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 comes from Qwen; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview comes from Google. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.