Side-by-side comparison
Qwen3.5-9B vs Reka Edge
| Qwen3.5-9B | Reka Edge | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Rekaai |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 16,384 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0400 | 0.1000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1500 | 0.1000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-9B or Reka Edge?
Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper than Reka Edge on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.005 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5-9B or Reka Edge?
Qwen3.5-9B has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 16k tokens for Reka Edge. That means Qwen3.5-9B can ingest about 16.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen3.5-9B and Reka Edge?
Qwen3.5-9B comes from Qwen; Reka Edge comes from Rekaai. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.