Side-by-side comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B vs Rocinante 12B
TheDrummer
Rocinante 12B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1700
Output / 1M
$0.4300
| Qwen3 30B A3B | Rocinante 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | TheDrummer |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 40,960 | 32,768 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0900 | 0.1700 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4500 | 0.4300 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B or Rocinante 12B?
Qwen3 30B A3B is cheaper than Rocinante 12B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.03 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 30B A3B or Rocinante 12B?
Qwen3 30B A3B has the larger context window at 41k tokens versus 33k tokens for Rocinante 12B. That means Qwen3 30B A3B can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen3 30B A3B and Rocinante 12B?
Qwen3 30B A3B comes from Qwen; Rocinante 12B comes from TheDrummer. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.