Side-by-side comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B vs Trinity Large Preview
Arcee AI
Trinity Large Preview
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1500
Output / 1M
$0.4500
| Qwen3 30B A3B | Trinity Large Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Arcee AI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 40,960 | 131,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0900 | 0.1500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4500 | 0.4500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B or Trinity Large Preview?
Qwen3 30B A3B is cheaper than Trinity Large Preview on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.03 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 30B A3B or Trinity Large Preview?
Trinity Large Preview has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 41k tokens for Qwen3 30B A3B. That means Trinity Large Preview can ingest about 3.2x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen3 30B A3B and Trinity Large Preview?
Qwen3 30B A3B comes from Qwen; Trinity Large Preview comes from Arcee AI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.