Side-by-side comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B vs GPT Audio Mini
| Qwen3 235B A22B | GPT Audio Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | OpenAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.4550 | 0.6000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.8200 | 2.4000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B or GPT Audio Mini?
Qwen3 235B A22B is cheaper than GPT Audio Mini on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.3625 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B or GPT Audio Mini?
Qwen3 235B A22B has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 128k tokens for GPT Audio Mini. That means Qwen3 235B A22B can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen3 235B A22B and GPT Audio Mini?
Qwen3 235B A22B comes from Qwen; GPT Audio Mini comes from OpenAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.