Side-by-side comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs gpt-oss-120b
Qwen
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0710
Output / 1M
$0.1000
| Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 | gpt-oss-120b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | OpenAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0710 | 0.0390 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.1800 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or gpt-oss-120b?
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than gpt-oss-120b on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.024 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or gpt-oss-120b?
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 131k tokens for gpt-oss-120b. That means Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and gpt-oss-120b?
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comes from Qwen; gpt-oss-120b comes from OpenAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.