Side-by-side comparison
Qwen VL Plus vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Meta
Llama Guard 4 12B
👁 Vision
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1800
Output / 1M
$0.1800
| Qwen VL Plus | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Meta |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 163,840 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, json_mode | vision, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1365 | 0.1800 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4095 | 0.1800 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen VL Plus or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper than Qwen VL Plus on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.093 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen VL Plus or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window at 164k tokens versus 131k tokens for Qwen VL Plus. That means Llama Guard 4 12B can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen VL Plus and Llama Guard 4 12B?
Qwen VL Plus comes from Qwen; Llama Guard 4 12B comes from Meta. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.