Side-by-side comparison
Qwen VL Max vs Seed 1.6
ByteDance Seed
Seed 1.6
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2500
Output / 1M
$2.0000
| Qwen VL Max | Seed 1.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | ByteDance Seed |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.5200 | 0.2500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.0800 | 2.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen VL Max or Seed 1.6?
Seed 1.6 is cheaper than Qwen VL Max on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.175 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen VL Max or Seed 1.6?
Seed 1.6 has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 131k tokens for Qwen VL Max. That means Seed 1.6 can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen VL Max and Seed 1.6?
Qwen VL Max comes from Qwen; Seed 1.6 comes from ByteDance Seed. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.