Side-by-side comparison
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs MiniMax M2-her
Qwen
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Input / 1M
$0.6600
Output / 1M
$1.0000
| Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | MiniMax M2-her | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | MiniMax |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 32,768 | 65,536 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.6600 | 0.3000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.0000 | 1.2000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or MiniMax M2-her?
MiniMax M2-her is cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.08 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or MiniMax M2-her?
MiniMax M2-her has the larger context window at 66k tokens versus 33k tokens for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct. That means MiniMax M2-her can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and MiniMax M2-her?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comes from Qwen; MiniMax M2-her comes from MiniMax. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.