Side-by-side comparison
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Rocinante 12B
Qwen
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.3600
Output / 1M
$0.4000
TheDrummer
Rocinante 12B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1700
Output / 1M
$0.4300
| Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Rocinante 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | TheDrummer |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 32,768 | 32,768 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.3600 | 0.1700 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4000 | 0.4300 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Rocinante 12B?
Rocinante 12B is cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.08 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Rocinante 12B?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comes from Qwen; Rocinante 12B comes from TheDrummer. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.