Side-by-side comparison
INTELLECT-3 vs MiniMax M2.1
Prime Intellect
INTELLECT-3
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2000
Output / 1M
$1.1000
| INTELLECT-3 | MiniMax M2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Prime Intellect | MiniMax |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 196,608 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2000 | 0.2900 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.1000 | 0.9500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, INTELLECT-3 or MiniMax M2.1?
MiniMax M2.1 is cheaper than INTELLECT-3 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.03 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, INTELLECT-3 or MiniMax M2.1?
MiniMax M2.1 has the larger context window at 197k tokens versus 131k tokens for INTELLECT-3. That means MiniMax M2.1 can ingest about 1.5x as much text per request.
What is the difference between INTELLECT-3 and MiniMax M2.1?
INTELLECT-3 comes from Prime Intellect; MiniMax M2.1 comes from MiniMax. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.