Side-by-side comparison
Perceptron Mk1 vs Qianfan-OCR-Fast
Baidu Qianfan
Qianfan-OCR-Fast
👁 Vision
Input / 1M
$0.6800
Output / 1M
$2.8100
| Perceptron Mk1 | Qianfan-OCR-Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Perceptron | Baidu Qianfan |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 32,768 | 65,536 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision | vision |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1500 | 0.6800 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.5000 | 2.8100 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Perceptron Mk1 or Qianfan-OCR-Fast?
Perceptron Mk1 is cheaper than Qianfan-OCR-Fast on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.92 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Perceptron Mk1 or Qianfan-OCR-Fast?
Qianfan-OCR-Fast has the larger context window at 66k tokens versus 33k tokens for Perceptron Mk1. That means Qianfan-OCR-Fast can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Perceptron Mk1 and Qianfan-OCR-Fast?
Perceptron Mk1 comes from Perceptron; Qianfan-OCR-Fast comes from Baidu Qianfan. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.