Side-by-side comparison
o4 Mini High vs GLM 5V Turbo
OpenAI
o4 Mini High
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.1000
Output / 1M
$4.4000
Z.ai
GLM 5V Turbo
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.2000
Output / 1M
$4.0000
| o4 Mini High | GLM 5V Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Z.ai |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 202,752 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 1.1000 | 1.2000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 4.4000 | 4.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, o4 Mini High or GLM 5V Turbo?
GLM 5V Turbo is cheaper than o4 Mini High on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.15 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, o4 Mini High or GLM 5V Turbo?
GLM 5V Turbo has the larger context window at 203k tokens versus 200k tokens for o4 Mini High. That means GLM 5V Turbo can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between o4 Mini High and GLM 5V Turbo?
o4 Mini High comes from OpenAI; GLM 5V Turbo comes from Z.ai. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.