Side-by-side comparison
o3 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.2500
Output / 1M
$10.0000
| o3 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 2.0000 | 1.2500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 8.0000 | 10.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, o3 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06?
o3 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.625 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, o3 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 200k tokens for o3. That means Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 can ingest about 5.2x as much text per request.
What is the difference between o3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06?
o3 comes from OpenAI; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 comes from Google. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.