L LLM Cloud Hub
Side-by-side comparison

o3 Deep Research vs Claude Opus 4.1

OpenAI

o3 Deep Research

πŸ‘ Vision πŸ”§ Tools {} JSON
Input / 1M
$10.0000
Output / 1M
$40.0000
View o3 Deep Research β†’
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

πŸ‘ Vision πŸ”§ Tools {} JSON
Input / 1M
$15.0000
Output / 1M
$75.0000
View Claude Opus 4.1 β†’
o3 Deep ResearchClaude Opus 4.1
Provider OpenAI Anthropic
Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary β†’ 200,000 200,000
Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). vision, tools, json_mode vision, tools, json_mode
Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary β†’ 10.0000 15.0000
Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5Γ— pricier than input. Glossary β†’ 40.0000 75.0000

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, o3 Deep Research or Claude Opus 4.1?

o3 Deep Research is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $20 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio β€” use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.

What is the difference between o3 Deep Research and Claude Opus 4.1?

o3 Deep Research comes from OpenAI; Claude Opus 4.1 comes from Anthropic. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities β€” see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.

Keyboard shortcuts

?
Show this overlay
/
Focus the first form field
g h
Go to / (home)
g b
Go to /best-llm-for
g c
Go to /cost
g s
Go to /self-hosted
g x
Go to /compliance
Esc
Close any overlay

Inspired by Linear and GitHub conventions. The two-key sequences (g then h) work within ~1 second.