L LLM Cloud Hub
Side-by-side comparison

gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

OpenAI

gpt-oss-120b

πŸ”§ Tools {} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0390
Output / 1M
$0.1800
View gpt-oss-120b β†’
NVIDIA

Nemotron Nano 9B V2

πŸ”§ Tools {} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0400
Output / 1M
$0.1600
View Nemotron Nano 9B V2 β†’
gpt-oss-120bNemotron Nano 9B V2
Provider OpenAI NVIDIA
Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary β†’ 131,072 131,072
Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). tools, json_mode tools, json_mode
Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary β†’ 0.0390 0.0400
Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5Γ— pricier than input. Glossary β†’ 0.1800 0.1600

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Nemotron Nano 9B V2?

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is cheaper than gpt-oss-120b on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.0095 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio β€” use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.

What is the difference between gpt-oss-120b and Nemotron Nano 9B V2?

gpt-oss-120b comes from OpenAI; Nemotron Nano 9B V2 comes from NVIDIA. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities β€” see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.

Keyboard shortcuts

?
Show this overlay
/
Focus the first form field
g h
Go to / (home)
g b
Go to /best-llm-for
g c
Go to /cost
g s
Go to /self-hosted
g x
Go to /compliance
Esc
Close any overlay

Inspired by Linear and GitHub conventions. The two-key sequences (g then h) work within ~1 second.