Side-by-side comparison
GPT Audio Mini vs R1 0528
| GPT Audio Mini | R1 0528 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | DeepSeek |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 128,000 | 163,840 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.6000 | 0.5000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.4000 | 2.1500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GPT Audio Mini or R1 0528?
R1 0528 is cheaper than GPT Audio Mini on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.175 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, GPT Audio Mini or R1 0528?
R1 0528 has the larger context window at 164k tokens versus 128k tokens for GPT Audio Mini. That means R1 0528 can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between GPT Audio Mini and R1 0528?
GPT Audio Mini comes from OpenAI; R1 0528 comes from DeepSeek. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.