Side-by-side comparison
GPT-4 vs Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$15.0000
Output / 1M
$75.0000
| GPT-4 | Claude Opus 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 8,191 | 200,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 30.0000 | 15.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 60.0000 | 75.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Claude Opus 4.1?
GPT-4 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-4 or Claude Opus 4.1?
Claude Opus 4.1 has the larger context window at 200k tokens versus 8k tokens for GPT-4. That means Claude Opus 4.1 can ingest about 24.4x as much text per request.
What is the difference between GPT-4 and Claude Opus 4.1?
GPT-4 comes from OpenAI; Claude Opus 4.1 comes from Anthropic. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.