Side-by-side comparison
GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude Opus Latest
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$10.0000
Output / 1M
$30.0000
Anthropic
Claude Opus Latest
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$5.0000
Output / 1M
$25.0000
| GPT-4 Turbo | Claude Opus Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 128,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 10.0000 | 5.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 30.0000 | 25.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Claude Opus Latest?
Claude Opus Latest is cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $5 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-4 Turbo or Claude Opus Latest?
Claude Opus Latest has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 128k tokens for GPT-4 Turbo. That means Claude Opus Latest can ingest about 7.8x as much text per request.
What is the difference between GPT-4 Turbo and Claude Opus Latest?
GPT-4 Turbo comes from OpenAI; Claude Opus Latest comes from Anthropic. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.