Side-by-side comparison
Nemotron 3 Super (free) vs MiniMax M2.5 (free)
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (free)
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0000
Output / 1M
$0.0000
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.5 (free)
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0000
Output / 1M
$0.0000
| Nemotron 3 Super (free) | MiniMax M2.5 (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | MiniMax |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 196,608 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super (free) or MiniMax M2.5 (free)?
Nemotron 3 Super (free) is cheaper than MiniMax M2.5 (free) on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Nemotron 3 Super (free) or MiniMax M2.5 (free)?
Nemotron 3 Super (free) has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 197k tokens for MiniMax M2.5 (free). That means Nemotron 3 Super (free) can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Nemotron 3 Super (free) and MiniMax M2.5 (free)?
Nemotron 3 Super (free) comes from NVIDIA; MiniMax M2.5 (free) comes from MiniMax. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.