Side-by-side comparison
Morph V3 Fast vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
| Morph V3 Fast | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Morph | Baidu Qianfan |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 81,920 | 123,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.8000 | 0.2800 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2000 | 1.1000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Morph V3 Fast or ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper than Morph V3 Fast on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.31 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Morph V3 Fast or ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has the larger context window at 123k tokens versus 82k tokens for Morph V3 Fast. That means ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B can ingest about 1.5x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Morph V3 Fast and ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ?
Morph V3 Fast comes from Morph; ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B comes from Baidu Qianfan. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.