Side-by-side comparison
Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen3 Max
| Kimi K2 0905 | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MoonshotAI | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.6000 | 0.7800 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.5000 | 3.9000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0905 or Qwen3 Max?
Kimi K2 0905 is cheaper than Qwen3 Max on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.79 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Kimi K2 0905 and Qwen3 Max?
Kimi K2 0905 comes from MoonshotAI; Qwen3 Max comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.