Side-by-side comparison
Pixtral Large 2411 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Mistral
Pixtral Large 2411
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$2.0000
Output / 1M
$6.0000
xAI
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
👁 Vision
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$2.0000
Output / 1M
$6.0000
| Pixtral Large 2411 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | xAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 2,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 2.0000 | 2.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 6.0000 | 6.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large 2411 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Pixtral Large 2411 is cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Pixtral Large 2411 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window at 2M tokens versus 131k tokens for Pixtral Large 2411. That means Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent can ingest about 15.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Pixtral Large 2411 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Pixtral Large 2411 comes from Mistral; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comes from xAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.