Side-by-side comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Reka Edge
Mistral
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0750
Output / 1M
$0.2000
| Mistral Small 3.2 24B | Reka Edge | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | Rekaai |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 128,000 | 16,384 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0750 | 0.1000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.2000 | 0.1000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or Reka Edge?
Reka Edge is cheaper than Mistral Small 3.2 24B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.0375 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or Reka Edge?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B has the larger context window at 128k tokens versus 16k tokens for Reka Edge. That means Mistral Small 3.2 24B can ingest about 7.8x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Reka Edge?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B comes from Mistral; Reka Edge comes from Rekaai. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.