Side-by-side comparison
Saba vs Solar Pro 3
| Saba | Solar Pro 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | Upstage |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 32,768 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2000 | 0.1500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.6000 | 0.6000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Saba or Solar Pro 3?
Solar Pro 3 is cheaper than Saba on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.025 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Saba or Solar Pro 3?
Solar Pro 3 has the larger context window at 128k tokens versus 33k tokens for Saba. That means Solar Pro 3 can ingest about 3.9x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Saba and Solar Pro 3?
Saba comes from Mistral; Solar Pro 3 comes from Upstage. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.