Side-by-side comparison
Saba vs Rocinante 12B
TheDrummer
Rocinante 12B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1700
Output / 1M
$0.4300
| Saba | Rocinante 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | TheDrummer |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 32,768 | 32,768 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2000 | 0.1700 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.6000 | 0.4300 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Saba or Rocinante 12B?
Rocinante 12B is cheaper than Saba on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.1 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Saba and Rocinante 12B?
Saba comes from Mistral; Rocinante 12B comes from TheDrummer. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.