Side-by-side comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs o4 Mini High
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.5
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.5000
Output / 1M
$7.5000
OpenAI
o4 Mini High
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.1000
Output / 1M
$4.4000
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | o4 Mini High | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | OpenAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 200,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 1.5000 | 1.1000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 7.5000 | 4.4000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or o4 Mini High?
o4 Mini High is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $1.75 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or o4 Mini High?
Mistral Medium 3.5 has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 200k tokens for o4 Mini High. That means Mistral Medium 3.5 can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Mistral Medium 3.5 and o4 Mini High?
Mistral Medium 3.5 comes from Mistral; o4 Mini High comes from OpenAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.