Side-by-side comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.1
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.4000
Output / 1M
$2.0000
Qwen
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1300
Output / 1M
$1.5600
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.4000 | 0.1300 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.0000 | 1.5600 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.355 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?
Mistral Medium 3.1 comes from Mistral; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.