Side-by-side comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.1
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.4000
Output / 1M
$2.0000
Qwen
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2600
Output / 1M
$2.0800
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.4000 | 0.2600 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.0000 | 2.0800 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.03 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 131k tokens for Mistral Medium 3.1. That means Qwen3.5-122B-A10B can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Mistral Medium 3.1 comes from Mistral; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.