Side-by-side comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Seed 1.6
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.1
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.4000
Output / 1M
$2.0000
ByteDance Seed
Seed 1.6
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2500
Output / 1M
$2.0000
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Seed 1.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | ByteDance Seed |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.4000 | 0.2500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.0000 | 2.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Seed 1.6?
Seed 1.6 is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.075 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Seed 1.6?
Seed 1.6 has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 131k tokens for Mistral Medium 3.1. That means Seed 1.6 can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Mistral Medium 3.1 and Seed 1.6?
Mistral Medium 3.1 comes from Mistral; Seed 1.6 comes from ByteDance Seed. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.