Side-by-side comparison
Devstral Medium vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Mistral
Devstral Medium
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.4000
Output / 1M
$2.0000
Qwen
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2200
Output / 1M
$1.8000
| Devstral Medium | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.4000 | 0.2200 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.0000 | 1.8000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Devstral Medium or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper than Devstral Medium on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.19 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Devstral Medium or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 131k tokens for Devstral Medium. That means Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Devstral Medium and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
Devstral Medium comes from Mistral; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.