Side-by-side comparison
MiniMax M2-her vs WizardLM-2 8x22B
| MiniMax M2-her | WizardLM-2 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Microsoft |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 65,536 | 65,535 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.3000 | 0.6200 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2000 | 0.6200 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2-her or WizardLM-2 8x22B?
WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper than MiniMax M2-her on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.13 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, MiniMax M2-her or WizardLM-2 8x22B?
MiniMax M2-her has the larger context window at 66k tokens versus 66k tokens for WizardLM-2 8x22B. That means MiniMax M2-her can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between MiniMax M2-her and WizardLM-2 8x22B?
MiniMax M2-her comes from MiniMax; WizardLM-2 8x22B comes from Microsoft. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.